The Semantics of Modal Predicate Logic I. Counterpart-Frames
نویسندگان
چکیده
We introduce a new semantics for modal predicate logic, with respect to which a rich class of first-order modal logics is complete, namely all normal first-order modal logics that are extensions of free quantified K. This logic is defined by combining positive free logic with equality PFL . = and the propositional modal logic K. We then uniformly construct—for each modal predicate logic L—a canonical model whose theory is exactly L. This proves completeness with respect to so-called modalstructures. We add some remarks on canonicity and frame-completeness and finally show that if suitable modal algebras of ‘admissible interpretations’ are added to modal predicate frames, general frame-completeness is gained.
منابع مشابه
The Semantics of Modal Predicate Logic II. Modal Individuals Revisited
We continue the investigations begun in [10]. We shall define a semantics that is build on a new notion of frame, called coherence frames. In these frames, objects are transcendental (world–independent), as in the standard constant–domain semantics. This will remove the asymmetry between constants and variables of the counterpart semantics of [10]. We demonstrate the completeness of (general) c...
متن کاملOn Two Models of Provability
Gödel’s modal logic approach to analyzing provability attracted a great deal of attention and eventually led to two distinct mathematical models. The first is the modal logic GL, also known as the Provability Logic, which was shown in 1979 by Solovay to be the logic of the formal provability predicate. The second is Gödel’s original modal logic of provability S4, together with its explicit coun...
متن کاملCombinations of Tense and Modality for Predicate Logic
In recent years combinations of tense and modality have moved into the focus of logical research. From a philosophical point of view, logical systems combining tense and modality are of interest because these logics have a wide field of application in original philosophical issues, for example in the theory of causation, of action, etc. But until now only methods yielding completeness results f...
متن کاملModal Foundations for Predicate Logic
The complexity of any logical modeling reeects both the intrinsic structure of a topic described and the weight of the formal tools. Some of this weight seems inherent in even the most basic logical systems. Notably, standard predicate logic is undecidable. In this paper, we investigatèlighter' versions of this general purpose tool, by modally`deconstructing' the usual semantics, and locating i...
متن کاملPossibilistic Semantics for a Modal KD45 Extension of Gödel Fuzzy Logic
In this paper we provide a simplified semantics for the logic KD45(G), i.e. the many-valued Gödel counterpart of the classical modal logic KD45. More precisely, we characterize KD45(G) as the set of valid formulae of the class of possibilistic Gödel Kripke Frames 〈W,π〉, where W is a non-empty set of worlds and π : W → [0, 1] is a normalized possibility distribution on W .
متن کامل